If exposition were a contact sport, In Your Dreams would be banned for life.

“Plot holes? We fell in.”
In Your Dreams
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Stevie and her little brother Elliot journey into the wildly absurd landscape of their own dreams to ask the Sandman to grant them the perfect family.
🍅 THE DEVIL TOMATO IS LIGHTING A MATCH FOR THIS REVIEW…
Stevie and her little brother Elliot journey into the wildly absurd landscape of their own dreams to ask the Sandman to grant them the perfect family.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
In Your Dreams treats "worldbuilding" the way a toddler treats a fruit bowl — enthusiastically, briefly, then forgotten.
In Your Dreams: proof the studio reads its own marketing too literally.
In Your Dreams has the emotional range of a fridge magnet.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
Unpopular opinion: In Your Dreams is the most overrated film of the decade
Everyone praising the In Your Dreams performances must have watched a different cut. The lead is sleepwalking through this and the supporting cast can't save it.
Hot Take: In Your Dreams's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Honestly, In Your Dreams would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in In Your Dreams actually is?
Rewatched In Your Dreams last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
The cinematography in In Your Dreams is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Look, I wanted to love In Your Dreams. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
