Even the popcorn looked bored during Puss in Boots.

“The devil tomato walked out.”
Puss in Boots
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Long before he even met Shrek, the notorious fighter, lover and outlaw Puss in Boots becomes a hero when he sets off on an adventure with the tough and street smart Kitty Softpaws and the mastermind Humpty Dumpty to save his town. This is the true story of The Cat, The Myth, The Legend... The Boots.
🌶️ SHARPENING THE HORNS…
Long before he even met Shrek, the notorious fighter, lover and outlaw Puss in Boots becomes a hero when he sets off on an adventure with the tough and street smart Kitty Softpaws and the mastermind Humpty Dumpty to save his town. This is the true story of The Cat, The Myth, The Legend... The Boots.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Laughed twice during Puss in Boots. Once was a sneeze.
Counted four explosions before the studio logo finished. Puss in Boots knows its audience.
Puss in Boots has the emotional range of a fridge magnet.
People also ask
Why is Puss in Boots rated highly on Roasted Tomatoes?+
Puss in Boots (2011) is praised with a low burn score on Roasted Tomatoes with a Burn Index of 34/100. Long before he even met Shrek, the notorious fighter, lover and outlaw Puss in Boots becomes a hero when he sets off on an adventure with the tough and street smart Kitty Softpaws and the mastermind Humpty Dumpty to save…
What streaming era or audience vibe does Puss in Boots fit best?+
Puss in Boots works best as a modern catalog staple for action fans. With a Burn Index of 34/100, pair it with viewers who can handle that heat level.
Is Puss in Boots worth watching according to Roasted Tomatoes?+
Puss in Boots scores 34/100 Burn — Roasted Tomatoes recommends it as a confident watch.
People Also Watched
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Puss in Boots?
Just got out of Puss in Boots and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Puss in Boots actually is?
Honestly, Puss in Boots would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
The cinematography in Puss in Boots is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Look, I wanted to love Puss in Boots. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Puss in Boots?
Everyone praising the Puss in Boots performances must have watched a different cut. The lead is sleepwalking through this and the supporting cast can't save it.
