Charlie's Angels: proof the studio reads its own marketing too literally.

“Script was written in ketchup.”
Charlie's Angels
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
The captivating crime-fighting trio who are masters of disguise, espionage and martial arts are back! When a devious mastermind embroils them in a plot to destroy individual privacy, the Angels, aided by their loyal sidekick Bosley, set out to bring down the bad guys. But when a terrible secret is revealed, it makes the Angels targets for assassination.
💀 APPLYING THIRD-DEGREE BURNS…
The captivating crime-fighting trio who are masters of disguise, espionage and martial arts are back! When a devious mastermind embroils them in a plot to destroy individual privacy, the Angels, aided by their loyal sidekick Bosley, set out to bring down the bad guys. But when a terrible secret is revealed, it makes the Angels targets for assassination.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Watched Charlie's Angels so you don't have to. You're welcome.
The science in Charlie's Angels has the same relationship to physics that I have to going to the gym: aspirational.
Counted four explosions before the studio logo finished. Charlie's Angels knows its audience.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
The cinematography in Charlie's Angels is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Look, I wanted to love Charlie's Angels. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Charlie's Angels actually is?
Just got out of Charlie's Angels and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Charlie's Angels?
Director clearly thought Charlie's Angels was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Charlie's Angels?
Rewatched Charlie's Angels last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
