Apollo 13 is a cinematic experience designed specifically for film students who want to feel superior at dinner parties.

“The tomato's grin says it all.”
Apollo 13
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
The true story of technical troubles that scuttle the Apollo 13 lunar mission in 1970, risking the lives of astronaut Jim Lovell and his crew, with the failed journey turning into a thrilling saga of heroism. Drifting more than 200,000 miles from Earth, the astronauts work furiously with the ground crew to avert tragedy.
🔥 CHARRING THE SCRIPT…
The true story of technical troubles that scuttle the Apollo 13 lunar mission in 1970, risking the lives of astronaut Jim Lovell and his crew, with the failed journey turning into a thrilling saga of heroism. Drifting more than 200,000 miles from Earth, the astronauts work furiously with the ground crew to avert tragedy.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
If Apollo 13 was a meal, it'd be unsalted rice with extra ego.
Two solid hours of characters staring intensely out of rain-slicked windows. Brilliant work, Apollo 13.
Watched Apollo 13 so you don't have to. You're welcome.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
Unpopular opinion: Apollo 13 is the most overrated film of the decade
Look, I wanted to love Apollo 13. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Apollo 13?
Rewatched Apollo 13 last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
Hot Take: Apollo 13's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Just got out of Apollo 13 and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
