If exposition were a contact sport, 2001: A Space Odyssey would be banned for life.

“Script was written in ketchup.”
2001: A Space Odyssey
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Humanity finds a mysterious object buried beneath the lunar surface and sets off to find its origins with the help of HAL 9000, the world's most advanced super computer.
💀 APPLYING THIRD-DEGREE BURNS…
Humanity finds a mysterious object buried beneath the lunar surface and sets off to find its origins with the help of HAL 9000, the world's most advanced super computer.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
2001: A Space Odyssey is what happens when a writers' room confuses "ambiguous" with "didn't finish the draft".
The science in 2001: A Space Odyssey has the same relationship to physics that I have to going to the gym: aspirational.
2001: A Space Odyssey thinks "scary" means turning the lights off and slamming a kitchen drawer.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in 2001: A Space Odyssey actually is?
Look, I wanted to love 2001: A Space Odyssey. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
The cinematography in 2001: A Space Odyssey is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Director clearly thought 2001: A Space Odyssey was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
Hot Take: 2001: A Space Odyssey's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Just got out of 2001: A Space Odyssey and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
