Ghostbusters has the emotional range of a fridge magnet.

“Popcorn's burnt. Like this film.”
Ghostbusters
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
After losing their university jobs, three parapsychologists start a ghost-catching business in New York City and uncover a supernatural threat that could destroy the world.
🚬 LIGHTING A CIGAR OFF THE SCREENPLAY…
After losing their university jobs, three parapsychologists start a ghost-catching business in New York City and uncover a supernatural threat that could destroy the world.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Ghostbusters: proof the studio reads its own marketing too literally.
Ghostbusters treats "worldbuilding" the way a toddler treats a fruit bowl — enthusiastically, briefly, then forgotten.
If exposition were a contact sport, Ghostbusters would be banned for life.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Ghostbusters?
Honestly, Ghostbusters would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
The cinematography in Ghostbusters is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Everyone praising the Ghostbusters performances must have watched a different cut. The lead is sleepwalking through this and the supporting cast can't save it.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Ghostbusters?
Just got out of Ghostbusters and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
Unpopular opinion: Ghostbusters is the most overrated film of the decade
Look, I wanted to love Ghostbusters. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
