Thunderbolts* is what happens when a writers' room confuses "ambiguous" with "didn't finish the draft".

“Plot holes? We fell in.”
Thunderbolts*
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
After finding themselves ensnared in a death trap, seven disillusioned castoffs must embark on a dangerous mission that will force them to confront the darkest corners of their pasts.
🍅 THE DEVIL TOMATO IS CACKLING IN THE PROJECTION BOOTH…
After finding themselves ensnared in a death trap, seven disillusioned castoffs must embark on a dangerous mission that will force them to confront the darkest corners of their pasts.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
If exposition were a contact sport, Thunderbolts* would be banned for life.
Thunderbolts* treats "worldbuilding" the way a toddler treats a fruit bowl — enthusiastically, briefly, then forgotten.
Counted four explosions before the studio logo finished. Thunderbolts* knows its audience.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Thunderbolts*?
Honestly, Thunderbolts* would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
Unpopular opinion: Thunderbolts* is the most overrated film of the decade
Director clearly thought Thunderbolts* was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Thunderbolts* actually is?
Just got out of Thunderbolts* and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
