Even the popcorn looked bored during Las Vegas.

“Certified chaotic energy.”
Las Vegas
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Ed Deline is a strict ex-CIA officer who went from being Head of Security to becoming President of Operations of the Montecito, whose job is to run the day-to-day operations of the casino. Following his departure, former Marine Danny McCoy, Ed's former protégé, becomes the Montecito's new President of Operations.
🍅 THE DEVIL TOMATO IS CACKLING IN THE PROJECTION BOOTH…
Ed Deline is a strict ex-CIA officer who went from being Head of Security to becoming President of Operations of the Montecito, whose job is to run the day-to-day operations of the casino. Following his departure, former Marine Danny McCoy, Ed's former protégé, becomes the Montecito's new President of Operations.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Las Vegas is a cinematic experience designed specifically for film students who want to feel superior at dinner parties.
Las Vegas treats "worldbuilding" the way a toddler treats a fruit bowl — enthusiastically, briefly, then forgotten.
I've seen screen savers with more depth and fewer unnecessary lens flares than Las Vegas.
People also ask
Why is Las Vegas rated highly on Roasted Tomatoes?+
Las Vegas (2003) is praised with a low burn score on Roasted Tomatoes with a Burn Index of 30/100. Ed Deline is a strict ex-CIA officer who went from being Head of Security to becoming President of Operations of the Montecito, whose job is to run the day-to-day operations of the casino. Following his departure, former…
What streaming era or audience vibe does Las Vegas fit best?+
Las Vegas works best as a modern catalog staple for drama fans. With a Burn Index of 30/100, pair it with viewers who can handle that heat level.
Is Las Vegas worth watching according to Roasted Tomatoes?+
Las Vegas scores 30/100 Burn — Roasted Tomatoes recommends it as a confident watch.
People Also Watched
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
Hot Take: Las Vegas's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Look, I wanted to love Las Vegas. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Las Vegas actually is?
Just got out of Las Vegas and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Las Vegas?
Rewatched Las Vegas last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
