What's My Line?: proof the studio reads its own marketing too literally.

“This film is a war crime against cinema.”
What's My Line?
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Four panelists must determine guests' occupations - and, in the case of famous guests, while blindfolded, their identity - by asking only "yes" or "no" questions.
🌶️ SHARPENING THE HORNS…
Four panelists must determine guests' occupations - and, in the case of famous guests, while blindfolded, their identity - by asking only "yes" or "no" questions.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
What's My Line? is what improv class warned you about.
Watched What's My Line? so you don't have to. You're welcome.
What's My Line? has the emotional range of a fridge magnet.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
Unpopular opinion: What's My Line? is the most overrated film of the decade
Honestly, What's My Line? would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in What's My Line? actually is?
Look, I wanted to love What's My Line?. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in What's My Line??
Rewatched What's My Line? last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
The cinematography in What's My Line? is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Director clearly thought What's My Line? was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
