Even the popcorn looked bored during Star Trek: Enterprise.

“Two thumbs down from hell.”
Star Trek: Enterprise
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
During the mid-22nd century, a century before Captain Kirk's five-year mission, Jonathan Archer captains the United Earth ship Enterprise during the early years of Starfleet, leading up to the Earth-Romulan War and the formation of the Federation.
💀 APPLYING THIRD-DEGREE BURNS…
During the mid-22nd century, a century before Captain Kirk's five-year mission, Jonathan Archer captains the United Earth ship Enterprise during the early years of Starfleet, leading up to the Earth-Romulan War and the formation of the Federation.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
People also ask
Why is Star Trek: Enterprise rated highly on Roasted Tomatoes?+
Star Trek: Enterprise (2001) is praised with a low burn score on Roasted Tomatoes with a Burn Index of 25/100. During the mid-22nd century, a century before Captain Kirk's five-year mission, Jonathan Archer captains the United Earth ship Enterprise during the early years of Starfleet, leading up to the Earth-Romulan War and the f…
What streaming era or audience vibe does Star Trek: Enterprise fit best?+
Star Trek: Enterprise works best as a modern catalog staple for sci-fi fans. With a Burn Index of 25/100, pair it with viewers who can handle that heat level.
Is Star Trek: Enterprise worth watching according to Roasted Tomatoes?+
Star Trek: Enterprise scores 25/100 Burn — Roasted Tomatoes recommends it as a confident watch.
People Also Watched
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Star Trek: Enterprise?
Director clearly thought Star Trek: Enterprise was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
Hot Take: Star Trek: Enterprise's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Just got out of Star Trek: Enterprise and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Star Trek: Enterprise?
Everyone praising the Star Trek: Enterprise performances must have watched a different cut. The lead is sleepwalking through this and the supporting cast can't save it.
