The script for JAG feels like it was entirely written by an algorithm fed nothing but energy-drink commercials.

“This film is a war crime against cinema.”
JAG
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Harmon "Harm" Rabb Jr. is a former pilot turned lawyer working for the military's JAG (Judge Advocate General) division, the elite legal wing of officers that prosecutes and defends those accused of military-related crimes. He works closely with Lt. Col. Sarah Mackenzie, and together they do what needs to be done to find the truth.
🧂 SALTING THE WOUNDS…
Harmon "Harm" Rabb Jr. is a former pilot turned lawyer working for the military's JAG (Judge Advocate General) division, the elite legal wing of officers that prosecutes and defends those accused of military-related crimes. He works closely with Lt. Col. Sarah Mackenzie, and together they do what needs to be done to find the truth.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
If JAG was a meal, it'd be unsalted rice with extra ego.
Two solid hours of characters staring intensely out of rain-slicked windows. Brilliant work, JAG.
Counted four explosions before the studio logo finished. JAG knows its audience.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
The cinematography in JAG is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Rewatched JAG last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in JAG?
Just got out of JAG and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in JAG?
Director clearly thought JAG was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
