If exposition were a contact sport, Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan would be banned for life.

“Script was written in ketchup.”
Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
When CIA analyst Jack Ryan stumbles upon a suspicious series of bank transfers his search for answers pulls him from the safety of his desk job and catapults him into a deadly game of cat and mouse throughout Europe and the Middle East, with a rising terrorist figurehead preparing for a massive attack against the US and her allies.
🚬 LIGHTING A CIGAR OFF THE SCREENPLAY…
When CIA analyst Jack Ryan stumbles upon a suspicious series of bank transfers his search for answers pulls him from the safety of his desk job and catapults him into a deadly game of cat and mouse throughout Europe and the Middle East, with a rising terrorist figurehead preparing for a massive attack against the US and her allies.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan?
Honestly, Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan actually is?
Just got out of Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
The cinematography in Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Rewatched Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
