Watched Evil so you don't have to. You're welcome.

“This film is a war crime against cinema.”
Evil
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
Skeptical forensic psychologist Kristen Bouchard joins priest-in-training David Acosta and technology expert Ben Shakir as they investigate supposed miracles, demonic possessions, and other extraordinary occurrences to assess for a scientific explanation or if something truly supernatural is at work.
💀 APPLYING THIRD-DEGREE BURNS…
Skeptical forensic psychologist Kristen Bouchard joins priest-in-training David Acosta and technology expert Ben Shakir as they investigate supposed miracles, demonic possessions, and other extraordinary occurrences to assess for a scientific explanation or if something truly supernatural is at work.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Two solid hours of characters staring intensely out of rain-slicked windows. Brilliant work, Evil.
Counted four explosions before the studio logo finished. Evil knows its audience.
I've seen screen savers with more depth and fewer unnecessary lens flares than Evil.
People also ask
Why is Evil rated highly on Roasted Tomatoes?+
Evil (2019) is praised with a low burn score on Roasted Tomatoes with a Burn Index of 22/100. Skeptical forensic psychologist Kristen Bouchard joins priest-in-training David Acosta and technology expert Ben Shakir as they investigate supposed miracles, demonic possessions, and other extraordinary occurrences to a…
What streaming era or audience vibe does Evil fit best?+
Evil works best as a modern catalog staple for crime fans. With a Burn Index of 22/100, pair it with viewers who can handle that heat level.
Is Evil worth watching according to Roasted Tomatoes?+
Evil scores 22/100 Burn — Roasted Tomatoes recommends it as a confident watch.
People Also Watched
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Spoilers] Can we discuss that absolutely baffling ending in Evil?
Director clearly thought Evil was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
Hot Take: Evil's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Look, I wanted to love Evil. The trailer had me hyped. But sitting through the second hour felt like a homework assignment. The dialogue is exposition stacked on exposition and the score keeps telling me how to feel.
The cinematography in Evil is doing all the heavy lifting and it shows
Just got out of Evil and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Evil actually is?
Rewatched Evil last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
