If Weapons was a meal, it'd be unsalted rice with extra ego.


“Even the credits needed a rewrite.”
Weapons
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
The story interweaves multiple storylines, following a group of people whose fates become intertwined after the mysterious disappearance of a young woman. As they navigate the escalating horror, they soon discover a connection to supernatural forces that may be far more dangerous than initially perceived.
🌶️ SHARPENING THE HORNS…
The story interweaves multiple storylines, following a group of people whose fates become intertwined after the mysterious disappearance of a young woman. As they navigate the escalating horror, they soon discover a connection to supernatural forces that may be far more dangerous than initially perceived.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Counted the jumpscares in Weapons. Lost count. Lost interest. Refunded the popcorn emotionally.
Weapons has the emotional range of a fridge magnet.
Watched Weapons so you don't have to. You're welcome.
People also ask
Why is Weapons roasted on Roasted Tomatoes?+
Weapons (2025) is torched as a high-burn watch on Roasted Tomatoes with a Burn Index of 78/100. The story interweaves multiple storylines, following a group of people whose fates become intertwined after the mysterious disappearance of a young woman. As they navigate the escalating horror, they soon discover a conn…
What streaming era or audience vibe does Weapons fit best?+
Weapons works best as a fresh-release theater & early streaming pick for horror fans. With a Burn Index of 78/100, pair it with viewers who can handle that heat level.
Is Weapons worth watching according to Roasted Tomatoes?+
Roasted Tomatoes scores Weapons at 78/100 Burn — worth it mainly for a hate-watch or a memorably messy night.
People Also Watched
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Weapons?
Just got out of Weapons and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
Unpopular opinion: Weapons is the most overrated film of the decade
Rewatched Weapons last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
Hot Take: Weapons's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Director clearly thought Weapons was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Weapons actually is?
Honestly, Weapons would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.
