If Weapons was a meal, it'd be unsalted rice with extra ego.

Weapons
Masterfully crafted. Un-roastable.
An absolute cinematic disaster.
No synopsis available. Probably for the best.
🌶️ SHARPENING THE HORNS…
Synopsis withheld out of mercy.
Cast information unavailable.
Public Roast Feed
Counted the jumpscares in Weapons. Lost count. Lost interest. Refunded the popcorn emotionally.
Weapons has the emotional range of a fridge magnet.
Watched Weapons so you don't have to. You're welcome.
Unfiltered Reddit Outrage
Simulated r/movies discussion threads · curated commentary timeline.
[Serious Discussion] Is anyone else completely checked out by the pacing in Weapons?
Just got out of Weapons and I'm convinced critics are being paid in residuals. Two genuinely good scenes do not make a film. Convince me otherwise.
Unpopular opinion: Weapons is the most overrated film of the decade
Rewatched Weapons last night and noticed even more plot holes than the first time. The motivations don't track at all once you stop and think about act two.
Hot Take: Weapons's third act ruined what could have been a masterpiece
Director clearly thought Weapons was deeper than it is. There's a difference between ambiguous and unfinished, and this leans hard into the second.
Why does no one talk about how mid the writing in Weapons actually is?
Honestly, Weapons would be a tight 95-minute movie. Instead we got a bloated runtime padded with B-roll and lingering shots that add nothing.